When I say “form factors”, I’m talking about the general ergonomic thing we humans mash our meat mitts upon, as apposed to what the Wikipedia entry for the subject entails. In my estimation, there are ten form factors, each having their own benefits and drawbacks, but for the most part today’s computing world has really been honed down to just three. Let’s start by having a look at all of them, starting with my favourite!
If you’re alive in 2018, you probably already know that the top three form factors are:
- All-Touch Smartphone
- ATX/mATX/Slim Tower
Let’s look at why this is the case…
All-touch smartphones, especially the large “phablet” ones, absolutely are the most common home computers, even though their form factor is significantly different from all of the others. People are now able to carryout all of the same type of tasks on their all-touch smartphones as they are on any of the other platforms, with the biggest differences being the human interfaces and the software capabilities.
Where the all-touch smartphone fails to meet people’s needs, most often in the areas of entering large amounts of data and using specialized software that isn’t available on smartphones, the laptop/notebook form factor easily comes to the rescue. This design has the benefits of being ergonomic to use, all in one, and easily portable, making it probably the best overall computer design for average home use (or human beings in general). Most laptops are able to connect to external keyboards, mice, and screens as well, which dramatically increases their potential to meet the user’s needs, unlike the vast majority of smartphones which remain limited in this regard. As a result, laptops tend to be the most popular home computer systems for everything other than playing modern 3D games and extreme/niche productivity applications.
Finally, where both laptops and smartphones fail the user, the common ATX/mATX/Slim Tower (aka “Desktop PCs”) swoops in to fill every imaginable niche. Being that there are several standardized sized for the towers and only a handful of complimentary standards for the hardware components that go inside, people are able to mix and match components to build home computers that meet their specific needs – provided those needs do not include being effortlessly portable. It’s this versatility, along with the high requirements of hardware to play to modern PC-exclusive 3D games, that keep desktop PCs in homes. As game consoles become increasingly more powerful though, the need for “desktop PCs” will continue diminish, as nearly all the other home user’s computing needs can be satisfactorily met by laptops and smartphones.
Where does that leave all the other form factors?
With the exception of TV connected media player style computers that somewhat resemble Horizontal Desktop computers (yet are most often operated by remote controls or a combined wireless mouse/keyboard), the only remaining form factor of note for home computing is that of the Single Board Computers. The interesting thing about both media player computers and single board computers is that the diminutive size of their components and the low processing requirement of their software generally mean their form factors can be as large or as small as the user would like. In fact, many media player computers are indeed built using single board computers, such as the Raspberry Pi; In many respects, as far as home computing goes, they’re one in the same. Of course, single board computers are small enough to also being useful as hobby devices which can be integrated within robots and other electro-mechanical devices within the home. And with those exceptions behind, let’s look at why the other form factors have fallen out of favour with home computer users.
Computer In the Monitor
I’m sure Apple would disagree, but I think the truth here is that apart from people who like the specialized Apple ecosystem, most home computer buyers are leery of tying the heart of their computer purchase to the size and quality of the screen. If they want something bigger later, they’ll have upgrade the whole system. If the screen breaks and the warranty is up, chances are it would be cheaper to buy a new system – but if they had a tower, with its separate monitor, they could even go so far as to make due to a used $10 monitor. And perhaps the combination of laptop level performance, limited upgrade options, and lack of portability just makes this style of computer less attractive to the average home computer user.
No one has made this style of computer, with the screen, keyboard, and computer all built into a single chassis, for a very long time. This is probably largely due to the reasons I mentioned above. Indeed, if one part breaks or simply no longer suits your needs/desires, you’re likely facing the decisions to replace the whole unit rather than fixing or replacing the one aspect that needs attention. I’m not surprised this design fell out of favour relatively quickly (by the early 1980s). Still, as we can see with the Commodore PET line, the concept is capable of creating some very handsome and inspiring machines!
I think I’d also consider the “luggable” computers, such as the early Compaq, Commodore, and IBM machines, as all-in-one desktops, rather than laptops/notebooks. None of those machines physically operate in a manner similar to how laptops operate (like the front and back covers of a book) and all of them are as heavy or heavier than your average modern PC tower. So yeah, the luggables of yore are effectively all-in-ones too.
Computer in the Keyboard
I really like this design, probably in large part due to nostalgia, but it does have a number of practical merits as well. Firstly, the keyboard mechanism is far easier to replace than a screen would be, so provided the person likes using it, the having the keyboard built into the computer isn’t a big deal. Again, provided the keyboard isn’t made such that the computer is uncomfortable to use, having all of the computer parts inside the keyboard that’s going to be sitting on the table/desk is pretty handy. Really, a modern laptop is essentially the same thing when it’s built in screen is removed, which truly is a testament to the portability of the “Computer in the Keyboard” design. I like the concept, because it puts everything right where my “monkey tools” are interacting with the machine, thereby making the whole experience more tactile and personal. Yes, I am looking up at the screen, but I am always touching the keyboard! That said, it was the advent of the cheap rubber dome keyboard that caused this style of computer to fall out of favour in the mid 1990s. It just made more sense for OEMs to put the expensive parts into a cheap generic tower so they could plug in cheap (and easily replaceable) keyboards and mice, and so that’s how the industry evolved over the years. It’s a crying shame, because when you look at the variety of units that were made by Atari, Acorn, Sinclair, Amstrad, Commodore, Amiga, and other companies from the 1970s to 1990s, there’s just so much inspiring industrial design and personality to touch and feel and love! I really wish this form factor would make a comeback!
Smartphone with Keyboard
It seems that Blackberry is the final holdout in the smartphone with a keyboard market. Unfortunately, in my personal opinion as a former Blackberry Bold/Curve/Q10 user, I think their current products completely miss the target. What made the Bold 9900 such an excellent device was that it could be used with one hand – literally every function could be accomplished using only my thumb! I miss that so much that I would honestly trade my Samsung Galaxy S8 for a Bold 9900 that had an updated camera, because as a communications device, the Bold 9900 is perfect. These new “Key” branded devices on the other hand are so tall that they are unwieldy, meaning you’re really better off to just use an all touch smartphone with an on screen keyboard. It’s not like the on screen keyboards are as tiny and inaccurate as they used to be. I think eventually Blackberry will stop making phones with keyboards, because the devices they are making are for a niche of an already niche group, rather than being targeted explicitly towards busy people need a quality device that excels at calls, SMS/MMS/BBM, email, and pictures.
As much as I do like the cutesy looks of the IBM PS/2, Commodore 64D, and Apple IIGS horizontal desktop computers, I think they fell out of favour for logical, if mundane, reasons. People got used to looking at the 4:3 LCD monitor that was plunked on their desk as work. I know I did for a few years, until I decided to prop my monitor up on a box in the hopes that it would help me stop slouching (it has helped!). Putting the “computer box” on the floor meant people had more room for stuff on their desk. That said, I imagine the single biggest factor in shoving the desktop computer to the floor was that hard disk storage capacity displaced the need for removable media – people simply didn’t need to fiddle with storage media anymore, so the box may as well be out of their way! Again, this makes me a little sad, because I really like the physical and auditory aspects of using 3.5″ floppy disks. It’s too bad we don’t have anything similar anymore, but really, it’s not very often I need to plug my smartphone into the computer, let alone use a USB stick or CD/DVD. Yup, with so little reason to touch the desktop “box”, off the desk it went.
I think as time goes on we’ll see more of the tablet/laptop hybrid devices in people’s homes, as processing power increases, power consumption decreases, and software becomes more optimized for lower power devices. Eventually gaming consoles will be robust and cheap enough to cross the point where “gamers” won’t bother with the extra issues PCs bring with them. Instead they will, like most everyone else, do the majority of their communicating and data processing on their smartphones, while filling in the holes in their productivity with a convertible tablet/laptop style machine. Perhaps in as little as a decade the only computers resembling the “ATX Tower PC” will be the workstations that power content creation and research in the business and education sectors, with the most powerful home computers essentially being the laptops we’re using today. On the whole, I think that’s probably a positive progression for home computing, as the laptop/notebook form factor really is the culmination of all the aspects of computing that we humans enjoy. And hey, if the screen breaks at least you’ll have your very own modern-retro computer when you hook it up to an external monitor! 🙂